Abstract

This study compares maritime carrier liability under Saudi Commercial Maritime Law and the Brussels and Hamburg Conventions. It uses a comparative analytical method to examine obligations, liability, exemptions, compensation, insurance and claims. It finds that Saudi law follows Hamburg’s approach to liability for loss, damage and delay, balancing cargo interests and carrier interests. Effective protection, however, depends on the interaction of liability rules, compensation limits, insurance coverage and claims procedures. It recommends addressing ambiguities in compensation limits and notice requirements, and coordinating carriage, insurance and recourse rules, drawing on suitable solutions in both conventions to ensure effective compensation and balanced protection.

Keywords

legal liability, maritime carrier, goods, Saudi Commercial Maritime Law, Brussels Convention, Hamburg Convention.